How to Win Lini vs. Furina Trial in Genshin Impact: Denials and Evidence

Lini vs. Furina Hydro Archonta Focalors. Help him prove his innocence and find rebuttals to all the arguments of the opponent.

In this guide, we will look at how to speak at the court session of Lini against Furina, how to win the court, we will suggest the correct answers and the sequence of using all the evidence.

How to choose evidence for refutation

Return to the hall and continue to participate in the trial. At first, the meeting was shown as a dialogue, but after the break, a new game mechanic opens up "Refutation". Now you have to go through a mini-game and prove that Lini is innocent.

How rebuttal works:

• study the testimony of the other side to find untenable parts of the presentation - untruthful;
• the evidence collected earlier in the theater will help to refute the links of events;
• replace the red gears put forward by Focalors with your own blue conclusions;
• Oratrix's position is visible in the background - convince the device and the public that the Traveler's arguments are correct;
• after the correct arrangement of events, complete the cycle of refutation and reveal the truth.

Lini's actions in the tunnel: rebuttal

The first chain will go "Lini's Activities in the Tunnel", for which a correct refutation is to be found. The key will be to restore the sequence of Lini's actions and observations.

There are 5 points in total, set the correct evidence for each of them and show that Furina is wrong:

1. Lini enters the tunnel - This fact can't be refutedsince the guy actually went down there during the countdown.
2. Lini attacks Halsey - must be used "Lini's Tale"but there is no correct answer.
3. Lini kidnaps Halsey - select "A Voice in the Oratis Core Room". Being in another room, the illusionist could not attack the girl.
4. Lini stuns Cowell - use evidence here "Girl Clothes", because the magician was confused by the traces of the struggle he saw.
5. Scene incident - there is no suitable refutation, since the case with the death of an assistant really happened.

After the chain of events is restored, Paimon will take the floor and present the assembled version to the court.

What is the proof that Lini was not in the tunnel at the time of the crime?

Next, discuss the alibi and listen to Hydro Archon's accusations. You will find the answer to the tricky question in the Journal of the case "Magical Exchange at the Opera House" - select "Strange sound during performance". The evidence proves that Lini was not in the tunnel at the time of the crime.

The real culprit in this case: the logical chain

Further Focalors will demand to explain who is the real killer in the opinion of the defense side. To do this, the hero will start creating a logical chain - a new court mechanics, where it is necessary to draw conclusions based on the collected evidence.

How the logical chain works:

• in the upper corner there are gear icons, by clicking on which you can study the questions on the case;
• after filling in all the gaps, check the correctness of the judgments. If the relationship does not converge, then you will have to choose new links from the remaining options;

• after correct answers to all questions, the construction of the chain will be successfully completed.

At this stage the hero closes the first three questions on his own. Just scroll through his reasoning until you get to the last link:

• Question: How did the killer provoke the incident on stage? True evidence: Report on the results of the investigation.
• Question: What was the original plan for the show? True evidence: Magic trick.
• Question: What proves the participation of the selected viewer in the event? True evidence: Girl's clothes.
• Question: Who is the only person who had a chance to commit a crime? True evidence: Information about the deceased - Cowell worked as an assistant and had access to a secret room and props. The rest of the evidence, "information about a missing girl" and "the possibility of a third party" will not work.

Cowell's criminal plan and the situation in the tunnel: a logical chain

Next, it remains to be restored what really happened: what Cowell did and how he became a victim of his crime.

Here, some options will have to be re-selected several times, since it is not known where Halsey disappeared.

• Question: How can we understand that Lini could not participate in the crime? True evidence: Lini's story - according to his words, he was not in the tunnel at that moment.
• Question: How to prove that there really was a conflict in the tunnel? True evidence: A strange sound during the performance - indicates that there was a struggle under the hall.
• Question: Who is the prime suspect now? True evidence: Information about the deceased - Cowell works as an assistant, which means he had free access to the props.
• Question: Where did Halsey go? There is no real evidence.

At the last question, the chain of thought will come to a dead end, since the rest of the evidence won't fit. Put all possible first and make three false chainsto get the Traveler to think.

Then the desired clue will appear in their place.

• Question: Where did Halsey go? True evidence: A broken vase is actually not an accident, but an attempt to cover up the traces.

How to restore the killer's criminal plan: a logical chain

After the arguments put forward, a gendarme will appear in the hall, who found an unusual liquid in Cowell's things. Lini's version will be confirmed by the facts, and the meeting will continue. Proceed to building a new logical chain:

• Question: Who is the prime suspect now? True evidence: Information about the deceased - the criminal, according to the defense, is still the magician's assistant.
• Question: What prop did the killer use to control the dissolution time? True evidence: A thrown hook on a rope - with its help, the criminal poured water on the victim at the appointed time.
• Question: How did the killer dissolve Halsey? True evidence: Primordial Sea Water - It has the ability to turn people into liquid and was in a box.
• Question: What props did the killer use to hide the mechanism of the murder? True evidence: The device of the magic box in the auditorium - it seems that there was something else.

Events in the tunnel: rebuttal

The gendarme Vonn will appear, who will bring fake leads against the accused. When the Hydro Archon comes up with her line of accusation, convince her and the audience to tip the scale in your favor.

At first there will be no denials - no options not fit. But then help comes Naviawho found the "dissolved" girl. How to beat Furina:

1. Lini enters the tunnel - evidence to refute no.
2. Halsey's dissolution - the correct answer would be "Strange sound during performance".
3. Lini and Cowell fight - select evidence for this statement "Broken Vase".
4. Lini stuns Cowell - evidence to disprove "Girl Clothes".
5. Scene incident - here also nothing to resistbecause it is the truth.

The heroes will finally prove Lini's innocence and clear the friend's name of unfair accusations, at which the court session of the task "Prelude of White Dews and Black Waves" will come to an end. Traveler talk to the illusionist and leave the theater.

We hope this guide helped you figure out how to win Lini vs. Furina in Genshin Impact. Read the full walkthrough for the Archons quest builds.